|
|
|
Posted Date: Tuesday, July 5, 2022
|
The Supreme Court held that, Congress did not grant the EPA the authority to devise emission caps based on the Clean Power Plan’s generation-shifting approach. The court further held that, under the major questions doctrine, an agency must point to “clear congressional authorization” when promulgating rules of “vast economic and political significance.”
|
|
|
|
Posted Date: Tuesday, July 5, 2022
|
The Supreme Court held that a government agency must conform to any clear legislative statements when interpreting and applying a law, but courts will give the agency deference in the interpretation of ambiguous statements as long as its interpretation is reasonable.
|
|
|
|
Posted Date: Thursday, June 23, 2022
|
The Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court's finding that CashCall engaged in a deceptive loan scheme in violation of the Consumer Financial Protection Act.
|
|
|
|
Posted Date: Wednesday, June 22, 2022
|
The Second Circuit held that non-national bank entities are not entitled to protection under the National Bank Act from state-law usury claims merely because they are assignees of a national bank.
|
|
|
|
Posted Date: Tuesday, June 21, 2022
|
The Supreme Court held that the removal restrictions statutorily applied to the director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau were unconstitutionally restrictive and severable from the rest of the Dodd-Frank Act.
|
|
 |
|
Posted Date: Friday, March 20, 2015
|
The Supreme Court issued an opinion on interpretive rules and whether amendments to such rules require a notice-and-comment procedure under the Administrative Procedures Act. Read on to learn what America’s highest court decided.
|
|
 |
|
Posted Date: Friday, February 6, 2015
|
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) issued a consent order on Feb. 4 that found that Continental Finance Company, LLC (Continental), a subprime credit card company, engaged in deceptive acts or practices by making false statements regarding fees and by misrepresenting certain security deposits as “FDIC insured.”
|
|
 |
|
Posted Date: Tuesday, January 27, 2015
|
In Jesinoski v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court clarified the requirements for rescinding a contract under the Truth in Lending Act.
|
|
 |
|
Posted Date: Tuesday, January 6, 2015
|
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is not the only entity that can file complaints for unfair, deceptive, or abusive acts or practices under the Dodd-Frank Act. Read on to learn more about the settlement of the first lawsuit filed by a state regulator under Section 1042.
|
|
 |
|
Posted Date: Friday, December 5, 2014
|
According to a Zillow employee, after he reported alleged “rampant” fraudulent activity to Zillow management, the company retaliated against him in violation of the whistleblower protections in the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
Monthly Newsletter |
Cover Story:
|
|