A New York judge cited reasoning used in dismissing the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s (CFPB) case against a company for allegedly scamming 9/11 first-responders and former NFL players in dismissing the New York Attorney General’s case against the same company.
The judge ruled that the AG’s lawsuit was invalid because it invoked a Dodd-Frank Act statute she deemed invalid in a previous ruling.
Find out the reasoning behind the judge’s decision.