After receiving two unrelated orders for information from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, a financial company used the latter of the two as evidence to a support its contention that the bureau was subjecting the company to undue burden, which it argued upon receiving the first order.
The company petitioned to have the CID set aside or modified, then cited a second CFPB information inquiry it received to support its position.
Find out details about the company’s argument and the bureau’s response.